Is Your Implementation Model Ready for the Cloud Era?

As an Acumatica VAR, you've witnessed the dramatic shift in how businesses consume technology. Cloud solutions have transformed everything from software delivery to customer expectations. Yet many VARs still approach implementations with a legacy mindset that could be holding them back. Let's explore why traditional implementation models might be limiting your growth and how to evolve for today's market demands.

The Legacy Trap: When Traditional Models Hold You Back

Picture this: You're running a growing Acumatica practice. Your instinct is to build internal departments, hire W2 employees, and structure projects around time-and-materials billing. It's a familiar model that's served the industry for decades. But in today's cloud-first world, this approach can create significant challenges:

The Hidden Costs of Building Internal Teams

While having full-time employees might seem like the path to stability, it often leads to:

  • Inflexible overhead costs that eat into margins during slow periods

  • Significant investment in recruiting, training, and retention

  • Complex cross-departmental coordination challenges

  • Limited ability to scale quickly for large projects

  • Risk of knowledge silos when key employees leave

Without addressing these challenges, VARs risk falling behind more agile competitors who can adapt quickly to market demands.

The Time-and-Materials Trap

Traditional T&M billing might feel secure, but it creates several problems:

  • Constant justification of hours to clients, eroding trust

  • Value perception is tied to time spent rather than outcomes delivered

  • Administrative overhead tracking and reporting hours

  • Difficulty forecasting revenue and scaling operations

  • Client hesitation to approve necessary work due to cost uncertainty

The Modern Approach: Building a Scalable Implementation Practice

Forward-thinking VARs are adopting new models that prioritize flexibility, scalability, and predictable revenue. Here's what that looks like in practice:

Strategic Partnership Networks

Instead of building everything in-house, successful VARs are:

  • Partnering with specialized service providers for specific expertise

  • Maintaining a lean core team focused on leading client relationships

  • Leveraging partner networks to scale up or down as needed

  • Reducing fixed overhead while increasing delivery capabilities

  • Creating new revenue streams through partner services

Subscription-Based Implementation Services

Moving away from T&M to fixed-fee monthly subscriptions offers numerous advantages:

  • Predictable revenue streams for better business planning

  • Improved cash flow for both VAR and client

  • Focus on value delivery rather than hour tracking

  • Natural pathway to ongoing support and optimization services

  • Stronger long-term client relationships

The Results Speak for Themselves

VARs who've adopted this modern approach report:

  • 20-30% higher project margins

  • Improved client satisfaction scores

  • Reduced administrative overhead

  • More predictable revenue forecasting

  • Better ability to handle multiple concurrent implementations

Making the Transition: Steps for Success

Ready to modernize your implementation approach? Here's how to get started:

  1. Assess Your Current Model

    1.    Analyze your true costs of internal staffing

    2.    Calculate time spent on administrative tasks

    3.    Review client satisfaction metrics

    4.    Evaluate project profitability patterns

  2. Build Your Partner Network

    1. Identify gaps in your service delivery

    2. Evaluate potential strategic partners

    3. Start small with pilot projects

    4. Develop clear partnership agreements

  3. Transform Your Pricing Model

    1. Design subscription-based implementation packages

    2. Create clear value propositions

    3. Develop transition plans for existing clients

    4. Train sales teams on the new approach

  4. Optimize Your Core Team

    1. Focus on relationship management skills

    2. Develop partner coordination capabilities

    3. Create efficient project management frameworks

    4. Build expertise in strategic consulting

The Cost of Inaction

VARs who cling to legacy implementation models face increasing challenges:

  • Eroding margins as competition increases

  • Difficulty attracting and retaining top talent

  • Limited ability to scale operations

  • Vulnerable to more agile competitors

  • Missed opportunities for recurring revenue

Looking Ahead: The Future of Implementation Services

The most successful Acumatica VARs will be those who:

  • Embrace flexible, partnership-based delivery models

  • Focus on outcomes rather than hours

  • Build predictable, recurring revenue streams

  • Maintain lean, efficient core operations

  • Leverage specialized expertise through partners

Remember, your implementation model isn't just about the initial project revenue - it's about building lasting partnerships that drive long-term value. While a traditional implementation might generate 150-600 hours of one-time service revenue, the real prize is in years 2-5 of client license renewals. A mediocre implementation that leads to client dissatisfaction doesn't just cost you future service revenue - it risks losing the much more valuable ongoing license renewal stream to another partner.

As you evaluate your implementation model, consider this: Are you optimizing for short-term project margins, or building a foundation for multi-year client partnerships that generate predictable, high-margin license renewal revenue? The most successful Acumatica VARs understand that implementation excellence is the gateway to lasting client relationships and sustained profitability.

The path to sustainable growth isn't through maximizing implementation hours - it's through delivering implementations that delight clients and keep them renewing year after year. The question isn't whether to modernize your approach, but how quickly you can make the transition to a client-first, long-term partnership model.

---

Looking to explore modern implementation models? Let's connect and discuss how to transform your Acumatica practice for the future. Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below.*

Derek Groniger

Derek Groniger is a Solution Architect at Business Consulting Leader, bringing over three decades of ERP solution expertise. His extensive experience spans manufacturing, distribution, field service, construction, and retail sectors. Derek has held various positions in sales and presales for VARs and publishers, and has twice been part of ownership. He holds former certifications with ERP systems like Infor, NetSuite, Sage, and CRM systems like Siebel and Salesforce.

Derek holds a BS from the University of Wisconsin and has pursued an MBA from Keller Graduate School. He is dedicated to providing top-notch ERP solutions and enhancing client satisfaction.

In his personal time, Derek enjoys anything outdoors involving water, such as spending time at the river, lake, or beach. He has also been part of a homeowners association maintenance team for several years, helping clear acres of parkland with chainsaws. A fun fact about Derek is that he is not from Texas, which he finds amusing since they welcome just about anyone down there.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/derekgroniger/
Previous
Previous

Demystifying Tariffs in Your Supply Chain

Next
Next

The Hidden Costs of "Good Enough": Your Path to Acumatica Excellence